Academic medical librarians and video consultations: our new normal (2026)
Collaborative large language models (LLMs) are all you need for screening in systematic reviews (2026, preprint)
”collaborative approach utilizing the two best-performing models (GPT-4 and Claude-3S) achieved an average precision of 99.9% and a recall of 98.5%”
AI, Automation, and the Future of Library Science Degree Careers (2026)
Thousands of paywalled research papers could be freed with this simple fix (2026, JCU librarians)
Latest issue of JMLA
Changing minds and methods: providing health sciences faculty with alternatives to systematic reviews assignments
Which Systematic Review Software Works Best? A Practical Comparison
good comparison table
bims: Biomed News (other listservs of possible interest to health librarians available on the Elist section of HLA)
how you can create your own alert if you are particularly interested in a topic, and then others can follow it etc
OpenEvidence
Google Vids – New (Sep 2025) / free (10 min length limit), cloud based, seems pretty easy to use / can provide text & a pretty good AI voice will provide the voiceovers / introductory video
Canadian Health Library Value Planner (2026) – available at Health Libraries – How to Demonstrate Value
Google Scholar title OR search
allintitle:dog | cat | “insulin resistance”
OpenAi launches Prism for researchers
“Prism (free) brings together drafting, editing, citation management, equations, and collaboration in a single, cloud-based environment. Built with native LaTeX support, the platform removes the need for complex local setups while enabling researchers to focus on their work rather than tooling”
AI agents are hiring human ‘meatspace workers’ — including some scientists (2026)
” … just a few of the tasks assigned to people on RentAHuman.ai — a platform that allows people to advertise their time and talent to artificial-intelligence agents”
Open-source AI tool beats giant LLMs in literature reviews — and gets citations right (2026)
Australia introduces open science policy to expand access and collaboration in health research (2026, old news but comes into effect Jan & Feb for MRFF & NHMRC respectively)
Are AI Tools Killing Review Articles? Two Failure Modes Suggest Otherwise (2026, Aaron Tay)
Keyboard shortcuts for Outlook (web version) – in case of use to anyone else who prefers the web version of Outlook (may work in the program also – not sure)
(note – this is with Gmail keyboard shortcuts activated via settings (cog icon top right) > General > Accessibility > Keyboard Shortcuts > select Gmail)
| Close email – U (takes you back to list view) |
| Delete email – Shft 3 (ie #) |
| Expand (conversation) – ; |
| Folders (move focus to) – Ctrl Y |
| Forward email – F |
| Go to Drafts – G D |
| Go to Inbox – G I |
| Go to Sent – G T |
| Junk – Shft 1 (send message to junk) |
| Keyboard shortcuts – ? |
| Label – L |
| Left panel (hide) – Alt F1 |
| Letter navigation – Alt > letter |
| Mark read – Shift I |
| Mark unread – Shift U |
| Move email to folder – V |
| New email – C |
| New Window – Shft Enter (new window. Win up arrow for full screen. Useful to see full chain) |
| Next email in list – J |
| Open first email – EnterPin – right click and select |
| Previous email in list – K |
| Reply – R |
| Reply all – A |
| Search – / |
| Select – X |
| Send – Ctrl Enter |
| Snooze – B (set it to reappear) |
Search:
category: e.g. category:tickets (via Label as above)
subject: e.g. subject:iron
from: e.g from:juliet
Boolean: e.g. AND OR NOT (e.g. received:12/03/2024 AND subject:ticket)
attachments: e.g. hasattachment:yes attachments:*.docx
received: e.g. received:today “this week” “this month” “this year” 12/03/2024
to: e.g. to:juliet
Many of you may have heard that Cheryl Hamill is exiting stage left (today actually) after many years being a leading light in health librarianship.
Read the poem written for her – by a librarian with clearly too little work to do – and discover her most ardent parting wish …
“One in four animals on the planet earth is a beetle. Think of your three closest friends – if none of them are beetles, statistically speaking you are probably a beetle” 🪲
New issues of JEAHIL, JCHLA (reviews of Lens, DynaMed, OpenAlex etc)
New Aaron Tay posts:
The Blank Box Problem: Why It’s Harder Than Ever to Know What to Type Into an AI Search Bar
Deep Research, Shallow Agency: What Academic Deep Research Can and Can’t Do
Google Scholar Labs (ask it a natural language question and it provides a set of citations with each having a summary of the answer underneath it)
Google Scholar blog (highlights and comments now available in Scholar PDF Reader)
Interesting read – Technically Accurate, Medically Fatal : The AI Error We Caught in Real-Time
Very extensive wiki on AI compiled by a medical librarian (Dean Guistini). Scroll down to see the most visited topics, review on individual tools
Conducting Systematic Reviews in a Day: Enter Artificial Intelligence (one of the authors is from the Centre for Journalology so must be good)
“We recently introduced otto-SR (Otto Science Institute), a generative AI system for automated screening and data extraction that incorporates advanced prompting strategies and agentic LLM workflows. Data from currently unpublished studies involving benchmarking against dual human reviewers suggest that otto-SR achieved superior performance in both screening (otto-SR: 96.7% sensitivity, 97.9% specificity; human: 81.7% sensitivity, 98.1% specificity) and data extraction (otto-SR: 93.1% accuracy; human: 79.7% accuracy) tasks. Most notably, otto-SR reproduced and updated an entire issue of the Cochrane library (12 SRs) in under 2 days*, highlighting the potential for automation to accelerate evidence synthesis and to provide decisionmakers with timely information. Across these 12 SRs, otto-SR included nearly twice as many eligible studies as the original Cochrane authors (114 versus 64 studies)”
* “Using otto-SR, we reproduced and updated an entire issue of Cochrane reviews (n=12) in two days, representing approximately 12 work-years of traditional systematic review work“. From the preprint describing Otto
Queryome: Orchestrating Retrieval, Reasoning, and Synthesis across Biomedical Literature
“More recently, the concept of agentic RAG has gained traction, promising more sophisticated “deep research” capabilities. Systems developed by industry leaders such as OpenAI [16], Perplexity AI [17], and Google [18] have demonstrated the ability to decompose complex questions, perform iterative searches, and synthesize more comprehensive reports. Yet, these general-purpose agentic systems are not specifically tailored for the biomedical domain … to bridge this gap, we introduce Queryome, a multi-agent deep research system designed specifically for end-to-end biomedical literature analysis. Queryome orchestrates a hierarchy of collaborating AI agents that perform iterative, multi-faceted searches against a curated, comprehensive search engine covering the entirety of PubMed [1]. Crucially, the system is engineered to reason over abstract text of every retrieved article, ensuring that its final synthesis is deeply grounded in the available evidence”
Available as an app for Windows & MacOS
Instats videos – quite a few are free (using Filters (top right) > Sort by > Free. Many are quite technical but there are a number on research, using statistical tools (R, Python etc). An upcoming one is AI Tools for Research 2.0 (requires free registration, can be watched later)
Previously mentioned the many useful ebooks available via Open Educational Resources (OER) but difficulty in keeping track on new ebooks available. You can sign up to receive updates here
Spotted in the Fin Review re terrible corporate jargon – being “Promoted Outwards” is “not about job cuts but giving employees the opportunity to embrace new challenges outside the organisation”